Op Ed on the Death of George Floyd and the Ensuing Riots

The May 26, 2020 death of a man named George Floyd triggered civil unrest in cities across America. The unrest continues to this day, with riots, looting, curfews, and the deployment of National Guard. Yet the mainstream narrative, believed by many, is deeply flawed.

First, there are indications the “protests” are not organic. For example on May 30th we learned that 80% of the rioters in Minneapolis came from out of state. They were not engaging in protests. Rather, they harmed local businesses (especially African American small businesses), homes, and the community. They harmed the good, hardworking Minneapolis residents who want to provide for their families in an atmosphere of peace and equality. Who told them to come to Minneapolis? How were they transported? How was the event organized, and who organized it? These questions demand answers.

Second, we learned that asphyxiation was not the cause of Floyd’s death. “Mr. Floyd had underlying health conditions including coronary artery disease and hypertensive heart disease,” said the complaint from the Hennepin County Attorney. “The combined effects of Mr. Floyd being restrained by police, his underlying health conditions and any potential intoxicants in his system likely contributed to his death.” https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/may/29/george-floyd-died-police-restraint-combined-health/ This undermines the widely-believed narrative of police brutality.

Third, the riots have afflicted mainly cities with radical left-wing governments. Why did the governors and mayors allow the riots and looting to continue unabated? Did these officials actually wish to allow the injury and death of citizens, with the destruction of homes, businesses, and livelihoods? Do they hate President Donald Trump so much that the death of their own citizens is a price they are willing to pay, in their misguided attempt to deflect blame onto Trump instead of onto lawbreakers and domestic terrorists where it belongs?

ObamaGate Started It All


WHO LEAKED GENERAL FLYNN’S NAME TO THE PRESS AND WHY?

>>9361988 lb

#Obamagate tags started it. You told a story over many day. You many not have noticed but i gave you a plan to start.
+4MM before they could end the trend in “Trends”
You kept adding and changing bring it back into “Trends”
> You forced the hand which made the mouth speak.
Remember what we said about the SENSEs?
Remember what we said about MEMETICs? > Our Definition
You need to get your IDEAS out of just the 8kun. They need to be heard. Louder than the [MSM]!!!
Remember this post this was next You were to expose the rest. And continue to force the HAND. Which will make the MOUTH speak.
We need answers to these questions THE [MSM] will see once we EXPOSE themt to light.

>>9353803 (You) pb
< Non-descriptive not repeating #1. Why did the DoJ learn about the FBI's interest in Flynn's conversations with the Russian Amb. from a CONVERSATION WITH OBAMA in the Oval Office? Ask me! >>9328302 pb
< See Image Obamagate 1 >>9328358 pb
< See Images Obamagate 3- (1-3) >“President Obama asked if Comey was saying that the NSC should not pass sensitive information related to Russia to Flynn.”
>(‘Hey Comey, are you saying we should hide Russia issues from Flynn?’) “potentially” #ObamaKnew Jan 5 2017
#obamagate #DemandAnswers

1b. How did the illegal spying on Flynn originate?
Strange that Obama knew of the FBI’s interest in Flynn’s talk w/ the Russian Amb. before the DoJ knew.
#obamagate #DemandAnswers

DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS IMPLIES?
>>> That the spying was directed by Obama.
>>9353900 pb
>It appears that the illegal spying was DIRECTED BY OBAMA.
>We don’t have direct evidence, but the indirect evidence is strong.
>Occam’s razor.
>HOW would Obama have known that the FBI planned to wiretap Flynn’s conversation with the Russian Ambassador for the purpose of either (1) trying to catch Flynn in some purported illegal act or (2) trying to get Flynn fired because Flynn’s position (DNI) and his potential or actual knowledge (of the Obama admin’s illegal acts) was a DANGER to the success of their coup plot to overthrow the government and prevent President Trump from governing.
>HOW would Obama have known that, unless he was involving in the planning, origination, or direction of that part of the plot?
>And if Obama knew about or directed the BEGINNING of the plot, it’s safe to say that Obama knew EVERYTHING about the plot from start to finish.
>It’s an inference, but a very strong inference.
>Remember the Page/Strzok texts?
>”POTUS WANTS TO KNOW EVERYTHING WE’RE DOING”
< See image in >>9353946 pb
>>9353946 pb
>This could be a great chant for when we are protesting in the street.

>OBAMA KNEW!
>KNEW ABOUT THE COUP!
>OBAMA KNEW!
>KNEW ABOUT THE COUP!

>repeat until teargassed

#2.
Why was Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn unmasked by Obama’s chief of staff, Joe Biden, Susan Rice, and others?
>>9334336 pb

< Covers Some content below no repost >>9335035 pb
>Did they suspect Flynn of collaborating with an adversary? (NOthat was a red herring, not the real reason)
>–Was it a fishing expedition, hoping to find dirt on Trump so they could obstruct his presidency? (POSSIBLY, but that wasn’t the fundamental reason either?)
>–Were they trying to create a cause of action for the eventual appointment of a special counsel to continually investigate a President (and his NSI, Flynn) who had done nothing wrong? YES!
>Their plan required demolishing the Trump presidency.
>It was bad enough that the people actually elected Trump.
>They had to either (1) impeach Trump during his 1st term (they tried), or (2) prevent Trump from having a 2nd term.
>They had to create a fake narrative that would make Trump look bad.
>Although [they] actually collaborated with individuals in Russia and elsewhere (e.g. Hillary selling the uranium and selling classified military secrets and Clinton Foundation receiving a $200M payment from Browder’s Russian company AFTER Hillary arranged for the uranium sale, and Bill Clinton receiving a ridiculously large honorarium for giving a brief speech in Russia), their tactic was to attribute Russian collaboration to Trump. To deflect it from themselves. So that if Trump tried to defend himself with the truth (did not collaborate with Russia to win 2016 election), [they] could say, “Look, Trump is trying to shift the blame”. So the accusations against Trump were 180 degrees opposite of what really happened and this was totally on purpose, contrived, anticipating how the defense against baseless accusations would go in a fake hoaxed-up indictment proceeding.
>No doubt they had the indictment in mind when unmasking Flynn. They HAD to create a pretext to surveil Flynn and 2nd-hand and 3rd-hand associations also scooped up in the illicit spying, hopefully scooping up all of Donald Trump’s and his family’s comms as well.
>The criminal case against Flynn was also part of the plan. They had to paint Flynn as a bad guy, a traitor, in order to smear Trump.
>The court proceeding also perhaps enabled some of the documentation to remain secret for a longer time than otherwise.
>Rosenstein and Mueller’s special counsel also managed to drag the thing on longer so that if Trump publicly unearthed proof that the allegations against him were false, and the allegations against [them] were true, [they] could deflect by saying Trump said this solely for political reasons because he was under examination by Mueller’s special counsel.

Ask me!
#obamagate #DemandAnswers

#3.
Why was Michael Flynn’s identity leaked—a CRIMINAL ACT—to the press?
>>9328291 pb
< See image Obamagate 3-0 >>9310582 pb (Answer)

3b. Who leaked his name and those conversations to the press?
>Anyone who unmasked after 29-Dec-16 is a suspect.
>>9323072 pb (Follow up Questions)
>WHY was Flynn’s ID leaked to the press?
>(Considering that leakage is a criminal act and the individual who leaked it likely knew they were breaking the law.)
>–WHAT did that individual hope to accomplish?
>–Did they leak to a known press ally with the intent that the leaked ID be published?
>–Was it to create a harsh public perception of the good General?
>–Was it to “launder” the info so it would seem to come from a journalist instead of directly from an Obama WH insider?
>–Was it to create a pretext for FBI interviewing Flynn?
>We KNOW from other declassified docs that the FBI set up Flynn. They wanted to frame him. They wanted to get him to lie and get him fired.
>–So WHY did they want Flynn fired?
>–Exactly HOW was Flynn a threat to their plans to usurp power and dump Donald Trump from the presidency by force? (I.e. a COUP)
>–What exact info / experience / contacts / plans did Flynn have that was detrimental to the Obama WH and/or detrimental to their plan to obstruct Trump’s presidency?

>Let’s do REAL JOURNALISM.

>The MSM is not going to answer these questions. They are too weak and stupid and corrupt. Their only motivation is to keep covering up the truth. We need anons to step up and do REAL JOURNALISM and dig into this puzzle and keep pulling the yarn until the pieces all come together.
#obamagate #DemandAnswers

#4.
Why did James Clapper, John Brennan, Samantha Power, and Susan Rice privately ADMIT UNDER OATH that they had no evidence of collusion, WHILE SAYING THE OPPOSITE PUBLICLY?
Ask me!

>>9356583 pb SEE IMAGE
>>9313342 pb
>We can do better. Real journalism requires facts, not just assertions.
>”When a person is prosecuted, there are separate federal regulations for perjury specifically and lying to the feds generally. Under the United States Code, title 18, section 1001, a person who knowingly or willingly makes a material statement that is false, or fraudulent, to the feds, is guilty of a crime. What comes as a surprise to many is that unlike section 1621, section 1001 does not require that a person be under oath.
>The difficulty that comes in prosecuting these crimes is the requirement that the statements be made knowingly or willingly. This allows those being accused of, or investigated for, perjury, to assert a lack of knowledge at the time of the statement that the statement was false. However, this may not be compelling enough to defeat or avoid a prosecution if contradictory evidence exists. Additionally, individuals who lie out of fear, or provide evasive answers, during a federal investigation, frequently find themselves facing the threat of federal prosecution.”
https://blogs.findlaw.com/blotter/2017/03/what-are-the-penalties-for-lying-to-congress.html

>Trying to teach anons how to think.
>Are there some lazy minds here?
>I’ll cut anons a break. Maybe some anons never saw real journalism.
>You grab a thread and start pulling on it. You ask questions and pull on all of them too. You construct the logical connections and write down what you find and what the proof is.
>Then you are RIGHT and you can WRITE.
>>9323600 pb

Washington Post Accidentally Reveals Who Leaked Flynn Call: Nine Obama Administration Officials

>February 17, 2017
>Obama loyalists working in Washington set the wheels in motion to take Flynn down before Obama was even out of office.
>The Washington Post may have accidentally spilled the beans on this in a recent article.
>“Neither of those assertions is consistent with the fuller account of Flynn’s contacts with Kislyak provided by officials who had access to reports from U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies that routinely monitor the communications of Russian diplomats. Nine current and former officials, who were in senior positions at multiple agencies at the time of the calls, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss intelligence matters.”
>“At the time of the calls” means these officials were in office during the Obama Administration.

That means it was nine Obama officials who leaked the calls.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/national-security-adviser-flynn-discussed-sanctions-with-russian-ambassador-despite-denials-officials-say/2017/02/09/f85b29d6-ee11-11e6-b4ff-ac2cf509efe5_story.html
>>9324175 pb

>Until those phone call transcripts get released, not sure how much interest OG will continue to generate.
>DJT’s got everyone running down rabbit holes with the Morning Joe story.
>Got to accept it’s an old story and gets stale easily without fresh meat.
>If there were 9 sources for the Flynn leak as the Post claims, that would be a statement by them.
>Ballsy move that achieved its objective – got Flynn out of WH.
>And each could provide cover for the other – safety in numbers.
>With Rice’s memo as icing on the cake for Hussein – giving him and them an added layer of insulation.
>Bet they thought their names would never be exposed though.

>>9324269 pb
>9 sources for the Flynn leak as the Post claims
They wanted to make SURE the leak got out. Getting Flynn’s name published must have been CRITICALLY IMPORTANT to their plan.
>>9324271 pb
>Because they had nothing to back up their Russia collusion claims and even unmasking him didnt prove a crime committed.
>So they leaked to the press because then that could be used to back up their investigation, as false evidence.
>They still never could charge him with a crime pertaining to Russia, or election meddling etc. And as Priestap’s notes said the goal was to get him to lie or trick him because it was THAT important to remove him

>>9334329 pb << SEE IMAGES IN PB >The FBI documents that put Barack Obama in the ‘Obamagate’ narrative
>Agents fretted sharing Flynn intel with departing Obama White House would become fodder for ‘partisan axes to grind.’
>Just 17 days before President Trump took office in January 2017, then-FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok texted bureau lawyer Lisa Page, his mistress, to express concern about sharing sensitive Russia probe evidence with the departing Obama White House.
>Strzok had just engaged in a conversation with his boss, then-FBI Assistant Director William Priestap, about evidence from the investigation of incoming National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, codenamed Crossfire Razor, or “CR” for short.
>The evidence in question were so-called “tech cuts” from intercepted conversations between Flynn and Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak, according to the texts and interviews with officials familiar with the conversations.
>Strzok related Priestap’s concerns about the potential the evidence would be politically weaponized if outgoing Director of National Intelligence James Clapper shared the intercept cuts with the White House and President Obama, a well-known Flynn critic.
>“He, like us, is concerned with over sharing,” Strzok texted Page on Jan. 3, 2017, relating his conversation with Priestap. “Doesn’t want Clapper giving CR cuts to WH. All political, just shows our hand and potentially makes enemies.”
>Page seemed less concerned, knowing that the FBI was set in three days to release its initial assessment of Russian interference in the U.S. election.
>“Yeah, but keep in mind we were going to put that in the doc on Friday, with potentially larger distribution than just the DNI,” Page texted back.
>Strzok responded, “The question is should we, particularly to the entirety of the lame duck usic [U.S Intelligence Community] with partisan axes to grind.”
>That same day Strzok and Page also discussed in text messages a drama involving one of the Presidential Daily Briefings for Obama.
>“Did you follow the drama of the PDB last week?” Strzok asked.
>”Yup. Don’t know how it ended though,” Page responded.
>“They didn’t include any of it, and Bill [Priestap] didn’t want to dissent,” Strzok added.
>“Wow, Bill should make sure [Deputy Director] Andy [McCabe] knows about that since he was consulted numerous times about whether to include the reporting,” Page suggested.
https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/fbi-documents-put-barack-obama-obamagate-narrative

Additional QUESTIONS
>Is it perjury to lie to a Congressional committee?
>Did these individuals give sworn testimony before Congress? When?
>Are the transcripts public? Where?
>Can we identify where in their sworn statements they denied any evidence of (Trump-Russia) collusion?
>Can we identify the public statements asserting that there WAS (Trump-Russia) collusion?
>If these statements differ as alleged,
>is that perjury?
>Is it a criminal offense?
>What statute?
>What’s the penalty if found guilty?
#obamagate #DemandAnswers

#5.
Why did the Obama administration use opposition research— funded by a political organization and filled with foreign dirt—to spy on members of the Trump campaign?
Ask me!

>>9336469 pb
>Here’s a little bit of research establishing that opposition research funded by a political organization was indeed used:
>The [anti-Trump rag] Washington Post admitted on Oct 25, 2017 that the DNC and Hillary’s presidential campaign helped pay for the opposition research that resulted in the discredited “dodgy dossier” alleging collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. (https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/debra-heine/2017/10/25/clinton-campaign-dnc-paid-oppo-research-led-discredited-anti-trump-dossier-n54220)
>According to the Washington Post, the opposition research firm Fusion GPS was retained in April 2016 by Marc Elias (of law firm Perkins Coie), a lawyer representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC. Fusion GPS then hired former British spy Christopher Steele to conduct the research (i.e. to assemble false rumors and innuendo into a “dossier” of allegations that Trump and his campaign actively colluded with the Russian government during the 2016 election). (I hate that word “dossier” because the word itself implies a package of credible evidence on a person.)
>The FBI used “dossier” – in conjunction with a Yahoo News report – in their fraudulent application for a FISA warrant. A version of the “dossier” was leaked to Yahoo News, which in turn wrote an article; this article was used in an attempt to create credibility for the “dossier” in a process that we could call “intelligence laundering”, i.e. a circuitous route that tries to conceal the actual source of intel.

>None of the dossier’s allegations of collusion have been verified. Lawyers for Steele admitted in court filings in April 2017 (http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/02/politics/donald-trump-spy-dossier/index.html) that Steele’s work was not verified and was never meant to be made public.

>The Federalist reported that OFA, Obama’s 2016 campaign arm, paid nearly $800,000 to Perkins Coie in 2016 alone, according to FEC records. The first 2016 payments to Perkins Coie, classified only as “Legal Services,” were made April 25-26, 2016, and totaled $98,047. A second batch of payments, also classified as “Legal Services,” were disbursed to the law firm on September 29, 2016, and totaled $700,000. Payments from OFA to Perkins Coie in 2017 totaled $174,725 through August 22, 2017. (https://thefederalist.com/2017/10/29/obamas-campaign-gave-972000-law-firm-funneled-money-fusion-gps/)

>So the next questions we need to get into are
>- “filled with foreign dirt” (i.e. what was in the dossier and can we prove that it was false? Perhaps somebody admitted it was false?)
>and
>- WHY was the dossier used by the Obama admin?
>Any budding journalists want to step up?
>Almost got this thing nailed…
#obamagate #DemandAnswers
extra images

View post on imgur.com

NOW BE THE NEWS

Timeline of a Pandemic & The Cure Hydroxychloroquine.

Timeline of a Pandemic
January 2017
Fauci weirdly predicted coronavirus in 2017
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-coronavirus-doctor-predicted-outbreak-called-emergency-health-fund-2017-1491901
Fauci warned (threatened?) US would face a surprise outbreak
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8188429/Dr-Fauci-revealed-fears-surprise-outbreak-three-YEARS-pandemic.html

October 2019
John Hopkins Hospital in Conjunction with the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation host a tabletop pandemic exercise in New York.
Event 201
https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/

December 2019
Coronavirus aka the flu hit California on December. People got it and got better. There was no pandemic at that time because impeachment preceedings we going on.
Studies after the fact comfirm that the virus was areound longer than reported.
Coronavirus infections could be much more widespread than believed, California study suggests
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-04-17/coronavirus-antibodies-study-santa-clara-county
Stanford antibody study estimates COVID-19 infected 50 to 85 times more people than testing identified in Santa Clara County

Stanford antibody study estimates COVID-19 infected 50 to 85 times more people than testing identified in Santa Clara County

January 2020
We are told that the first case arrived in January but data from the above links confirms otherwise. On January 30, President Trump declares a nationa health
emergency and imposes travel restriction btween USA and China. He is criticized heavily.

February 2020
President Trump warns America about coronavirus in the State of the Union Speech on February 4th. Nancy Pelosi ripped up the transcript because there was nothing of value to her.
Coronavirus Tesings begins. However much of the data was flawed from the start.
CDC’s failed coronavirus tests were tainted with coronavirus, feds confirm
https://arstechnica.com/science/2020/04/cdcs-failed-coronavirus-tests-were-tainted-with-coronavirus-feds-confirm/

February 29
During a press briefing, the Surgeon General said that masks do stop the spread of the virus.
Surgeon general: Data doesn’t back up wearing masks in public amid coronavirus pandemic
https://www.foxnews.com/media/surgeon-general-explains-masks-public-coronavirus

March 2020
New York began reporting cases in March.
“Elmhurst is at the center of this crisis, and it’s the number one priority of our public hospital system right now,” the city’s public hospital system’s statement said. “The front line staff are going above and beyond in this crisis, and we continue surging supplies and personnel to this critical facility to keep pace with the crisis.”
Elmhurst: neighbourhood at centre of New York’s Covid-19 crisis
https://www.ft.com/content/688c02b9-e583-4f16-a1d0-7fffd5235503
‘It’s what was happening in Italy’: the hospital at the center of New York’s Covid-19 crisis
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/27/new-york-coronavirus-elmhurst-hospital
Strangly, the hostipal at the center of the Covid19 crisis also happens to have a 4600 square ft simu;ation center where doctors and nurses and first responders practice on what would happen if there was a pandemic.
Elmhurst Hospital – Simulation Center

Simulation Center

On March 16 the White House press briefings begin. Dr. Fauci and Dr. Birx lay out their cases using models provided by the same groups that held the tabletop
exercise in October 2019 (John Hopkins Hospital and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation).
Outrageous! Dr. Birx Went All-In on Bill Gates-Funded Coronavirus Model – Sits on Gates-Funded Foundation Board

Outrageous! Dr. Birx Went All-In on Bill Gates-Funded Coronavirus Model – Sits on Gates-Funded Foundation Board


The Dark Truth About Fauci and Birx, Bill Gates And Globalist Elites
https://nationalfile.com/president-trump-vs-bill-gates-on-treatment-fauci-has-a-100-million-conflict-of-interest/
Bill Gates & the Coronavirus Conspiracy

Bill Gates & the Coronavirus Conspiracy


Bill Gates Thinks There are Too Many Africans/Calls for Population Control

Bill Gates Thinks There are Too Many Africans/Calls for Population Control


A Conversation with Bill Gates: Population Growth

March 21
During a press briefing, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo Admits COVID-19 Is a “Live Exercise

Mike Pompeo Admits COVID-19 Is a “Live Exercise,” Trump Retorts “I Wish You Would Have Told Us”

April 2020
CDC changes rules

THIS IS FRAUD: CDC’s Latest Rules Change Forces States to Include Confirmed AND PRESUMED Coronavirus Fatalities — States Forced to Pad Their Numbers

May 2020
What we now know, which is what we already knew but were convinced to believe otherwise. By the way, the groups that put forth the original data that was so wrong, are still the same groups putting for the flawed data that the MSM are using to declare their milestone.

Oh look, American Lung Association calls coronavirus the common cold.
https://www.lung.org/lung-health-diseases/lung-disease-lookup/influenza/facts-about-the-common-cold

Coronavirus Disease 2019 vs. the Flu
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/coronavirus-disease-2019-vs-the-flu

Dr. Anthony Fauci says a second wave of coronavirus is ‘not inevitable’
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/27/dr-anthony-fauci-says-a-second-wave-of-coronavirus-is-not-inevitable.html

If we look at this info with an open mind and connect the dots, we can easily determine that we have been played. Denial is no longer an option. Time to be brave. Time to accept that we were played and move forward with the truths that fully expose the lies.

 

Was Obama Pro Israel?


1) Joe Biden has said that he himself and Obama are both extremely pro-Israel.
https://archive.vn/szuFL – “Biden reassures Florida Jews on Israel”
https://archive.vn/GhSwJ – “Sen. Joe Biden reiterates support for Israel at two South Florida rallies”

2) Obama signed a $38 billion package of military aid for Israel over 10 years.
https://archive.vn/CA7gU – “U.S. Finalizes Deal to Give Israel $38 Billion in Military Aid”

3) Obama said “The example of Israel and its values was inspiring,” at a synagogue in 2015.
https://archive.vn/L7HVL – “An insider’s view: Eight years watching the first Jewish US president ”

4) Obama was very very close to the extremely zionist Rahm Emanuel.
https://archive.vn/Yqy7p – “Rahm Emanuel, Obama’s Chieff of Staff”

5) https://archive.vn/bsK8P – “Obama Hailed as a ‘Mensch’ After Moving Speech at NYC Synagogue: ‘Be Kind. Be Useful. Be Fearless’”

6) https://archive.vn/L7HVL – “An insider’s view: Eight years watching the first Jewish US president”
“As US President Barack Obama stood before the packed synagogue sanctuary, a white kippa comfortably atop his head, he spoke of the impact that images of kibbutzim, Israel’s founders and the 1967 war had on him as he was coming of age.

“To a young man like me, grappling with his own identity, recognizing the scars of race here in this nation, inspired by the Civil Rights struggle, the idea that you could be grounded in your history, as Israel was, but not be trapped by it, to be able to repair the world – that idea was liberating. The example of Israel and its values was inspiring,” Obama said that day, speaking in 2015 at my own synagogue, Adas Israel Congregation in Washington DC, in celebration of Jewish American Heritage Month.”

7) https://archive.vn/TlQsV – “William Kristol & Neocons Are Not Conservatives”
“William Kristol’s magazine shut down. Kristol’s conservative magazine that was against Trump did so because he was a neocon who wanted to spill American blood to alter the Middle East to protect Israel in a way that could never be accomplished. He wrote the book to justify the Iraq War. I knew Kristol personally. I found him arrogant and unwilling to change his position. What he called “conservativism” was extreme right-wing dominate the world stuff.

I have stated that the neocons will support the Democrats who are no means economically conservative provided they will support invading the Middle East and spilling American blood for his theory. His open letter stated:

“The Republican party allowed Donald Trump to capture it in 2016. This has been, I trust you agree, very bad for our country. As for the party, I’m not sure we’ll ever get it back on path to a decent and healthy American conservatism. It would be bad if Democrats went down a parallel path. America deserves better than a choice between an authoritarian populist of the right and a socialist populist of the left.”

Kristol is by no means an economic conservative. He will accept anyone who will invade the Middle East. His magazine shut down because he is so focused on invading the Middle East and has no respect for American soldiers or the economy. His magazine, which was once influential, shut down because of this extremist neocon view. He has been against Trump solely because of his pulling back troops from the Middle East.

Kristol is by no means an economic conservative. He has openly said he is voting for Joe Biden. He knows Trump is against war and the Democrats will always engage in war if the price is right. Obama was given the peace prize for just being the first Black President. He then advocated invading Syria and numerous military actions. Obama was trying to carry out the agenda of the neocons.”

Rahm Emanuel (connected to Obama):
http://archive.vn/RaLKq – “Rahm Emanuel’s Father Specialized in Terrorist Bus Bombings in Palestine”

A quote from that article:
”Emanuel’s father Benjamin was part of the Israeli assassin team that murdered Sweden’s Count [Folke] Bernadotte in ’48. Bernadotte was the UN envoy in Palestine who sought to find a solution to the UN Partition Plan that gave Palestinian land to Jews from “beyond the pale.”

Benjamin Emanuel, a Jew from Russia whose real name was Ezekiel Auerbach, was arrested by British police for terrorist activities in the months prior to Israeli independence”

http://archive.vn/0gAaU – “RAHM EMANUEL: Ardent Zionist called Obama’s ‘Svengali’”

Some screecaps from the chans regarding Rham Emanuel:
http://archive.vn/UcIwJ
http://archive.vn/Jtnlr
http://archive.vn/Kv2l8
http://archive.vn/MBmnw
http://archive.vn/yJ199

Amy Klobuchar Stood by while Minnesota Police killed an Unarmed Black Man

‘I Can’t Breathe’

After the Fact is was Reported:

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52806572

FBI to investigate death of black man in Minnesota after arrest
26 May 2020

Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar – reportedly shortlisted as Joe Biden’s running mate – issued a statement calling for a “complete and thorough outside investigation.”

“Justice must be served for this man and his family, justice must be served for our community, justice must be served for our country,” she said.

“I can’t breathe” became a national rallying cry against police brutality in the US after the July 2014 death of Eric Garner.

Garner, an unarmed black man, uttered the phrase 11 times after being detained by police on suspicion of illegally selling loose cigarettes. They were the final words of the 43-year-old, who died after a police officer placed him in a chokehold.

Anonymous Comments
I’m betting they want riots. Another Ferguson or Rodney King situation to stir shit up even more.

The amount of piece of shit pedo-Mason cops is probably shocking, a legion of filth and criminality that must be exposed and exterminated like diseased cattle, prison will be VERY hard for these foul pigs.

I find it interesting ‘they’ took a quote from Amy ‘Kobayashi’
Is this a way to get her name out there?

Lori Klausutis the 28yr old Psycho Joe Intern found dead under his desk

Death
Klausutis’ body was “found July 20 around 8 a.m. by a couple who arrived at the office in Fort Walton Beach for an appointment. She was found slumped over next to a desk on the floor of Scarborough’s office. A second employee who was normally at the office was away on vacation, and it was determined that she was dead for some time.”[5]
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Lori_Klausutis

Lori listed under Bush Body Count
THE BUSH BODY COUNT
http://pecangroup.org/full-disclosure/presidential-body-counts/bush-body-count/

A Death in the Congressman’s Office
Does Anybody in the Press Care About Lori Klausutis?
https://web.archive.org/web/20170701050151/http://www.americanpolitics.com/20010808Klausutis.html

September 29, 1999: the CIA formed In-Q-Tel, Gilman Louie its first CEO:
“The origins of the concept that has become In-Q-Tel are traceable to Dr. Ruth David, a former CIA Deputy Director for Science and Technology [she was appointed by President Obama as a member of the National Science Board and National Science Foundation in 2012]. She and her Deputy, Joan Isham, were the first senior Agency officials to understand that the information revolution required the CIAto forge new partnerships with the private sector and design a proposal for radical change.The timing of the proposal was fortuitous. The Director of Central Intelligence (DCI), George Tenet, had just launched his Strategic Direction initiative that included technology as one of its areas for review. The study made a direct link between the Agency’s future technology investments and improving its information gathering and analysis capabilities.”

Thus, the CIA owned a private American company within the U.S, clearly a violation of the law. Corporations stepped up to grab a slice of the profits, among whom were Telecredit, Inc.;Lockheed Martin Corp.and its Missile and Space Systems Com; Xerox Corp.; Columbia Univ.; Goldman Sachs; Lucent Technologies; AT&T; Stanford U.

>Joe’s Scarbo’s daddy worked for Lockheed.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/intelligence-history/in-q-tel

Scarborough and his first wife were running coed miss America pageants in Florida his dad George Scarborough stated the pageants ages 1-18 yr old girls

This one says she was dead a long time before body found. Says died afternoon or evening before body was found at 8 next morning.

Published: Sunday July, 22, 2001
Klausutis’ death not suspicious
The medical examiner said he is waiting to rule on the death until blood test results are finished.

By AMBER BOLLMAN | Daily News Staff Writer
The medical examiner investigating the death of Lori Klausutis said Saturday there is absolutely no evidence that the 28-year-old employee of U.S. Rep. Joe Scarborough was a victim of “foul play.”

Associate Medical Exam-iner Dr. Michael Berkland will announce how Klausutis died on Wednesday. He is waiting for blood test results and is continuing his investigation into her medical history.

“It would be foolish for me to release the cause of death without the toxicology results in my hand because that one little piece of the puzzle can make all the difference in the investigation,” said Berkland, who completed an autopsy on Klausutis’ body Saturday.


“But there is still no suspicion of foul play.”

Klausutis, of Niceville, was found dead on the floor of Scarborough’s Fort Walton Beach branch office at about 8 a.m. Friday when a couple arrived at the office for an appointment. Berkland said it is likely that Klausutis died sometime Thursday afternoon or evening.

“She had been dead for quite awhile before she was found,” Berkland said Saturday.

“Based on the physical evidence, I feel comfortable moving the time of her death back to the previous day.”

Klausutis’ death was likely accidental or the result of natural causes. Berkland said it is unlikely that her death was a suicide, but will not rule that out until the blood tests are returned.

“There is no evidence at all that this was an intentional act, but we can’t rule it out just yet,” Berkland said.

Toxicology reports, performed at a laboratory in Gainesville, will reveal the presence of any drugs or other unnatural substances in Klausutis’ body, Berkland said.

“I’ve been cautioning people against saying she died of natural causes because there could have been something present in her system that we can’t find until we get those results,” he added.

Berkland said Klausutis had been involved in a serious car accident as a teenager and still suffered from some lingering medical problems, but it is unknown whether those conditions played a role in her death. Many of her medical records are from another state and Berkland is waiting to review those as well before making an announcement.

Fort Walton Beach Police Chief Steve Hogue said he is also awaiting toxicology and medical examiner’s reports, though the department’s preliminary investigation revealed nothing suspicious inside Scarborough’s office. Officers found no signs of a struggle, break-in or robbery, Hogue said.

https://www.nwfdailynews.com/news/20171208/from-archives-stories-from-2001-related-to-scarborough-aide-klausutis-death

ObamaGate

#ObamaGate

This article Connects a lot of dots. stopped half way through to post when I saw Lee Smith put head clownfag Brennan and Susan Rice in the killbox

“We were looking for ties between al-Qaida and Iran,”
[C_A Director John] Brennan and [National Security Adviser Susan] Rice pulled the plug
I corrected the I > _ for him

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/russiagate-obama-iran

So if the Obama administration wasn’t alarmed by Flynn’s nonexistent ties to Russia, why was he Obama’s No. 1 target? Why were officials from the previous administration intercepting his phone calls with the Russian ambassador?

The answer is that Obama saw Flynn as a signal threat to his legacy, which was rooted in his July 2015 nuclear agreement with Iran—the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Flynn had said long before he signed on with the Trump campaign that it was a catastrophe to realign American interests with those of a terror state. And now that the candidate he’d advised was the new president-elect, Flynn was in a position to help undo the deal. To stop Flynn, the outgoing White House ran the same offense it used to sell the Iran deal—they smeared Flynn through the press as an agent of a foreign power, spied on him, and leaked classified intercepts of his conversations to reliable echo chamber allies.

“What made Flynn revolutionary is that he got people out in the field,” says Shahbandar, who served in Iraq under Flynn in 2007-08 and in Afghanistan in 2010-11. “It wasn’t just enough to have intelligence, you needed to understand where it was coming from and what it meant. For instance, if you thought that insurgents were going to take over a village, the first people who would know what was going would be the villagers. So Flynn made sure we knew the environment, the culture, the people.”

Influential senior officers like Gens. David Petraeus and Stanley McChrystal credited Flynn for collecting the intelligence that helped defeat al-Qaida in Iraq in 2007. In 2012, he was named DIA chief. The next year he secured access for a team of DIA analysts to scour through the documents that had been captured during the 2011 operation to kill Osama bin Laden.

“The bin Laden database was unorganized,” says a former senior DIA official. “There had been very little work on it since it was first captured. The C_A had done machine word searches to identify immediate threats, but they didn’t study it for future trends or strategic insight.” Flynn arranged for a team from United States Central Command, based in Tampa, Florida, to come up to Washington. The subject of their investigation was a potentially sensitive one.

“We were looking for ties between al-Qaida and Iran,”

says Michael Pregent, a former Army intelligence officer who was working on the bin Laden documents as a contractor. “We’re arguing with everyone—NSA, whoever else—telling them what we wanted and they kept saying

‘there’s nothing there, we already went through it.’ The C_A

and others were looking for immediate threats. We said ‘we’re DIA, we’re all-source analysts and we want everything to get a full picture.’”

Just as the CENTCOM team was preparing for their trip to Northern Virginia, they were shut down. “Everything was set,” says Pregent. “we had our hotel reservations, a team of translators, and access to all of the drives at the National Media Exploitation Center. Then I get a call in the middle of one of the NCAA basketball tournament games from the guy who was running our team.

He said that [C_A Director John] Brennan and [National Security Adviser Susan] Rice pulled the plug.”

The administration was, it appears, clearing space for Obama to implement his big foreign policy idea—the Iran nuclear deal. Another aide, Ben Rhodes, had said in 2013 that the Iran Deal was the White House’s key second-term initiative. Evidence that Tehran was coordinating with a terror group that had slaughtered thousands in Manhattan and at the Pentagon would make it harder to convince American lawmakers of the wisdom in legitimizing Iran’s nuclear weapons program.

What was the information about al-Qaida’s ties to Iran that Flynn wanted his CENTCOM team to get out? According to published news reports, the bin Laden database included“letters about Iran’s role, influence, and acknowledgment of enabling al-Qaida operatives to pass through Iran as long as al-Qaida did its dirty work against the Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan.” One of those letters showed that “Al-Qaeda was working on chemical and biological weapons”’in Iran.”

Who financed 9-11?
Who was Bin Laden’s handler?
Why was the Clowns In America tasked to hunt/kill/capture UBL?
Why not MI?

Illegal Surveillance on our POTUS?

Potentially illegal surveillance on Q Team/Potus

1-My past digs based on timelimes show the hack was discovered shortly before [ 93 dk], this was a hack of DISA–NSA/CSS? Infrastructure handling secured DOD comms for WH and Potus (and Q?)

2-Q went dark after and I believe this was a [Trap] of sorts related to illegally predicated surveillance, perhaps same Op related to JS, SC surveil. I believe Coats was involved and House (Nancy/Shifty/Nadler) provided cover.

3-Moar digs required but my premise is they were after Potus comms, and Q, Coats and intel agencies had a SAP, or hidden Op under leaker, Potus prior gave declass judgement to Barr. They set [Trap] or at least found hack, back traced, located SAP (Op), Barr declassed intel which predicated it, found it to be illegal (fake intel to predicate) and Coats was complicit and leaks appeared he was resigning. Coats resigned when Q came back I think and Kun started up.

4-I think this is HUGE because it follows the illegal Op pattern and occured later in the game, involved Coats and journalists, and MILITARY Secure Comms. AN attack on Potus and his MIL defenders by civilian Intel.

5-This was vital to getting Coats out, journos free, Comms secure and the next phase of justice started, by Exposing a grossly abusive action in the Coup against Potus.

Department of Defense’s DISA Confessed Data Breach

Department of Defense’s DISA Confessed Data Breach

U.S. agency that handles Trump’s secure communication suffered data breach
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-defense-breach-idUSKBN20E27A

Data breach hits agency overseeing White House communications
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-51580925

DISA

Computer systems controlled by DISA were hacked in the summer of 2019, and was reported in February 2020, exposing the personal data of about 200,000 people including names and social security numbers
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_Information_Systems_Agency


ERIC CIARAMELLA
“Former White House officials said
Ciaramella worked on Ukrainian policy issues for Biden in 2015 and 2016,
when the vice president was President Obama’s “point man” for Ukraine.
A Yale graduate, Ciaramella is said to speak Russian and Ukrainian,
as well as Arabic. He had been assigned to the NSC by Brennan {also speaks Arabic}.

SPEAKS RUSSIAN {perhaps Ukrainian}:
Nellie Ohr
Marie Yovanovitch
Eric Ciaramella

“Is Russian a common language to learn?”
“The FARM {C_A} requires select skill-sets.”
—-

>vice president was President Obama’s “point man” for Ukraine.

Rep. Louis Gohmert: Ciaramella was
“supposed to be a point person on Ukraine,
during the time when Ukraine was its most corrupt,
and he didn’t blow any whistles on their corruption.”

https://qmap.pub/read/4196
QPost# 2230

https://qmap.pub/read/2230
“Panic in DC re: Baker confirmed?
Note IG involved.
Huber >> IG (Horowitz) >> Storch
Q”

https://qmap.pub/players/read/94
“Senate-confirmed Inspector General at the National Security Agency.”
-“Robert is the vehicle/bridge for sharing cross-department info within the IG community.”–

https://qmap.pub/read/2211
New Player on the Chess Board:Robert Storch(NSA Inspector General)
“… serving as the Deputy Criminal Chief and Counsel to the U.S. Attorney.
“He was also posted overseas for two years as a
Department of Justice Resident Legal Advisor in Ukraine.”
DOJ Resident Legal Advisor in Ukraine from 2007 to 2009
President of Ukraine {during time 2007 – 2009 when STORCH was in Ukraine}
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Yushchenko

Prime Minister:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yulia_Tymoshenko
– Preceded by Viktor Yanukovych
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Yanukovych {EXILED in RUSSIA}

Ukraine is investigating alleged Biden phone call on removal of prosecutor

Ukraine is investigating alleged Biden phone call on removal of prosecutor

Ukraine’s government is reportedly investigating the release of audio recordings that purport to contain a conversation between Ukraine’s former president and former Vice President Joe Biden

The recordings, released by a Ukrainian lawmaker this week, have not yet been verified and reportedly do not contain any references to wrongdoing on Biden’s part. Their release comes amid an investigation targeting allies of the former Ukrainian president, The Associated Press reported.

“They governed the country in such a way that they could face many twists and convictions,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said of his predecessor, Petro Poroshenko, who is purported to be one of the voices on the tape. Zelensky has repeatedly accused him of corruption.

One analyst told the AP that the recordings did not appear to contain any damaging information or suggestions of wrongdoing.

Allies of President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump taps Brooke Rollins as acting domestic policy chief Trump takes pandemic fight to Michigan Trump to celebrate Memorial Day at Baltimore’s Fort McHenry MORE have long suggested that Biden was involved in efforts to fire a top prosecutor in Ukraine who was investigating Burisma Holdings, a company for which Biden’s son served as a board member. The company is reportedly not mentioned in the recordings.

Instead, the person identified as Poroshenko on the tapes is heard discussing the removal of the prosecutor, which he says in the recording was done to secure financial aid from the U.S.

“There is nothing super sensational in these conversations. Where is the dirt on Biden? Where is the reference to Burisma?” Volodymyr Fesenko, head of the Ukrainian-based think tank Penta, told the AP.

“None of it is there. Instead these are conversations between a dependent foreign politician and his boss, which is a sad but natural reality for us here, but is unlikely to impress the Americans,” he added.

Poroshenko said in a statement posted to Facebook that the recordings were falsified and part of a Russian-backed effort to “undermine bipartisan support of Ukraine in the United States.” The former Ukrainian leader called Biden a “friend” and “ally” of Ukraine and criticized Zelensky.

The Biden campaign declined to comment to the AP.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/499020-ukraine-is-investigating-alleged-biden-phone-call

HR6666 UP FOR VOTE IN HOUSE TOMORROW

HR6666 UP FOR VOTE IN HOUSE TOMORROW, I’M SURE THE FALSE FLAG IN ‘’’AZ’’’ WAS JUST A COINCIDENCE

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6666/text?r=2&s=1

To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID–19, and related activities such as contact tracing, through mobile health units and, as necessary, at individuals’ residences, and for other purposes.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
May 1, 2020

A BILL
SECTION 1. Short title.

This Act may be cited as the “COVID–19 Testing, Reaching, And Contacting Everyone (TRACE) Act”.

SEC. 2. COVID–19 testing and contact tracing using mobile health units.
(a) In general.—The Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting through the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, may award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for COVID–19, to trace and monitor the contacts of infected individuals, and to support the quarantine of such contacts, through—
(1) mobile health units; and

(2) as necessary, testing individuals and providing individuals with services related to testing and quarantine at their residences.
(b) Permissible uses of funds.—A grant recipient under this section may use the grant funds, in support of the activities described in subsection (a)—
(1) to hire, train, compensate, and pay the expenses of individuals; and
(2) to purchase personal protective equipment and other supplies.
(c) Priority.—In selecting grant recipients under this section, the Secretary shall give priority to—

(1) applicants proposing to conduct activities funded under this section in hot spots and medically underserved communities; and
(2) applicants that agree, in hiring individuals to carry out activities funded under this section, to hire residents of the area or community where the activities will primarily occur, with higher priority among applicants described in this paragraph given based on the percentage of individuals to be hired from such area or community.
(d) Distribution.—In selecting grant recipients under this section, the Secretary shall ensure that grants are distributed across urban and rural areas.
(e) Federal privacy requirements.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to supersede any Federal privacy or confidentiality requirement, including the regulations promulgated under section 264(c) of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–191; 110 Stat. 2033) and section 543 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 290dd–2).
(f) Definitions.—In this section:
(1) The term “eligible entity” means—

(A) a Federally qualified health center (as defined in section 1861(aa) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(aa)));
(B) a school-based health clinic;
(C) a disproportionate share hospital (as defined under the applicable State plan under title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 et seq.) pursuant to section 1923(a)(1)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r–4));
(D) an academic medical center;
(E) a nonprofit organization (including any such faith-based organization);
(F) an institution of higher education (as defined in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001));
(G) a high school (as defined in section 8101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7801)); or
(H) any other type of entity that is determined by the Secretary to be an eligible entity for purposes of this section.

(2) The term “emergency period” has the meaning given to that term in section 1135(g)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–5(g)(1)(B)).
(3) The term “hot spot” means a geographic area where the rate of infection with the virus that causes COVID–19 exceeds the national average.
(4) The term “medically underserved community” has the meaning given to that term in section 799B of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 295p).

(5) The term “Secretary” means the Secretary of Health and Human Services.
(g) Authorization of appropriations.—To carry out this section, there are authorized to be appropriated—
(1)$100,000,000,000 for fiscal year 2020; and
(2) such sums as may be necessary for each of fiscal year 2021 and any subsequent fiscal year during which the emergency period continues.